Wednesday 18 December 2013
Berikut dari hasil selidik salah seorang pengguna di P1 Wimax Sucks
Identiti Ms Nila sangat meragukan, dan dipercayai sebenarnya adalah pekerja P1wimax, maksudnya P1 menggunakan taktik kotor untuk menipu pelanggan
Jadi, sapa2 yang menerima surat lawyer tersebut, jangan gabra.. apa yang perlu anda lakukan adalah attach ssurat tersebut dan emailkan kepada Bar Council diatas penyalahgunaan syarikat guaman, tiru ayat dibawah dan hantar kepada : complaints-intervention@malaysianbar.org.my
The CEO
Bar Council Malaysia
13,15,17 Leboh Pasar Besar
50050 kuala lumpur
Dear sirs
Re: Use of Foong Hoe advocates & solicitors letterhead by unauthorised persons.
We refer to the above matter. Enclosed please find a copy of a letter using the letterhead Foong Hoe and another letter from a ms Nila of P1 wimax.
I wish to lodge a complaint against the above firm for
1. Allowing an unauthorised person ie Ms Nila to sign on behalf of the firm.
2. Misrepresenting the public that this is a valid letter of demand from the firm.
3. Directing the public to liase directly with the clients.
4. Directing the public to may payments directly into the clients account instead of receiving payments on behalf of clients.
I suspect that the firm has allowed clients to use its letterhead.
I hope to draw the attention of the Bar that this is unethical.
Kindly investigate this matter.
Thank you.
Bar Council Malaysia
13,15,17 Leboh Pasar Besar
50050 kuala lumpur
Dear sirs
Re: Use of Foong Hoe advocates & solicitors letterhead by unauthorised persons.
We refer to the above matter. Enclosed please find a copy of a letter using the letterhead Foong Hoe and another letter from a ms Nila of P1 wimax.
I wish to lodge a complaint against the above firm for
1. Allowing an unauthorised person ie Ms Nila to sign on behalf of the firm.
2. Misrepresenting the public that this is a valid letter of demand from the firm.
3. Directing the public to liase directly with the clients.
4. Directing the public to may payments directly into the clients account instead of receiving payments on behalf of clients.
I suspect that the firm has allowed clients to use its letterhead.
I hope to draw the attention of the Bar that this is unethical.
Kindly investigate this matter.
Thank you.
Adeh..sampai macam ni sekali dorg ek...keji betul...
ReplyDeletepacket Buddy P1 tak de suruh bawa turum artikel ini?
ReplyDeletePI Wimax kena beri penjelasan.....!
ReplyDeletetolong! :'( saya baru jer dapat surat macam nie, tapi bila dah belek2 surat nie ada tandatangan berkomputer pulak, tiada pulak nama miss Nilla nie, camana nie?
ReplyDeletesaya tak nak kena blacklist..., apa patut saya buat. susah hati saya :(
tolong lah siapa2 di sini bagitau caranya dan apa yang patut saya buat :(
I received the same letter with computer printed signature, without "ms Nina"
ReplyDelete